Safeguarding Training Levels: The Children and Adult Frameworks Have Diverged

The children’s intercollegiate document was replaced in November 2025 and has dropped per-level training hours entirely. The adult second edition from 2024 still specifies them. Here are both level structures in full, the 50 per cent participatory rule, the contact-based allocation rule, and why one combined training matrix no longer works.

Learnsignal Education Team
02 Nov 2026
10 min read
Updated

If your safeguarding training matrix says "Level 3: 8 hours" for both children and adults, half of it is now out of date.

The two intercollegiate documents that define safeguarding training levels in UK health care have diverged. The adult document, second edition 2024, still specifies hours per level. The children document was replaced in November 2025 and has dropped per-level hours entirely.

Any training plan or supplier quoting hours for children's safeguarding levels is working from the superseded 2019 edition.

Children and young people: the 2025 revision

The current document is the 2025 revision, Safeguarding children and young people and children and young people in care: Competencies for health care staff, published by the Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health on behalf of the intercollegiate steering group. It merges the 2019 fourth edition with the separate 2020 looked-after-children competencies, and it is published as a website rather than a PDF. An interim review is due in November 2028.

It is not statutory. It is professional consensus guidance that NHS England's assurance framework points providers towards.

The structure is five levels plus a sixth tier:

LevelNameWhoRefresher
1RecognitionAll health care professionals and staff with varying levels of patient contact, plus volunteersYearly update recommended, within mandatory training
2ResponseAll staff who encounter children and young people but do not deliver clinical care to themYearly update recommended, within mandatory training
3Action and expertiseStaff who deliver a clinical service to children and young people; plus adult mental health and drug and alcohol staff where there is significant risk to children and familiesCyclical refresh, rolling updates, discussed at annual appraisal
4Leadership role and additional responsibilitySenior and named doctors, nurses and midwives; specialist child psychologists and psychiatrists; safeguarding leads; named GP for safeguardingRevalidation cycle, expansive appraisal review
5Strategic oversight and system responseDesignated doctors and nurses; associate and deputy director and head-of rolesRevalidation cycle, expansive appraisal review
—AccountabilityExecutive and non-executive directors and senior managers across NHS providers, third-sector children's providers, mental health, hospices, residential care, family planning and sexual health, and commissioned independent providers that may treat childrenNot specified

No hours are specified at any level. The 2019 edition gave hours and e-learning versus face-to-face proportions; the 2025 revision gives neither.

Three further rules from the document that matter more than the hours ever did. The revalidation cycle is defined as three to five years, and safeguarding competence should be considered at every cycle. Competence carries down: someone competent at Level 3 is assumed competent at Levels 1 and 2. And organisations should allocate levels by each staff member's actual level of contact with children and young people — the suggested staff groups are explicitly not binding.

That third point is the one to act on. If you have been assigning levels by job title, the document says to assign them by contact. A ward clerk on a paediatric ward and a ward clerk in geriatrics are not the same case.

Adults: the 2024 second edition, which does still have hours

The adult document is Adult Safeguarding: Roles and Competencies for Health Care Staff, second edition, published by the Royal College of Nursing on 29 July 2024 and last updated that September. It updates the 2018 first edition.

LevelWhoSuggested hoursRefresher
1All staff across all health care settings, including non-clinical — reception, admin, catering, domestic, transport, porters, maintenance, peer support workers, and board members2 hoursEach 3-year period
2Staff with regular contact with patients, families, carers or the public — registered nurses, medical staff, nursing associates, allied health professionals, dental and optical professionals, pharmacists, students, phlebotomists, 111 and 999 control centre staff, safeguarding team administrators3 hoursPer 3 years
3Staff who assess, plan, deliver or evaluate care where safeguarding concerns exist, plus ICB commissioners — safeguarding professionals, medical and registered nursing staff, urgent care, psychologists, ambulance staff, health visitors, midwives, care home managers8 hours over 3 years, at least 50% participatory, plus reflective learning across at least three aspects of safeguardingPer 3 years
4Named professionals, safeguarding leads, heads of adult safeguarding, named doctors for primary care commissioning24 hours per 3 years, at least 50% participatoryPer 3 years, plus active professional registration and leadership training within 3 years of appointment
5Designated safeguarding professionals, heads of safeguarding, UK safeguarding leadsNo total statedYearly Level 5 update, at least 50% participatory

Note the "at least 50% participatory" condition at Levels 3, 4 and 5. That is the detail most often missed when organisations move safeguarding training to e-learning for cost reasons: for those levels, half of it cannot be e-learning.

And note who sits at Level 1: catering, domestic, maintenance, porters, transport — and board members. Which lines up with the national role descriptions for those posts, as we cover in our guide to the Care Workforce Pathway supporting roles.

Why the divergence matters practically

Most organisations run one safeguarding training plan covering both children and adults, with a single set of hours against each level. That is no longer possible to do accurately.

For adults you have suggested hours and a participatory proportion you can audit against. For children you have competencies, a contact-based allocation rule and a refresher tied to appraisal and revalidation — and no hours to count.

If your supplier is selling you an eight-hour Level 3 children's safeguarding course on the basis that the intercollegiate document requires it, the document no longer says that. The course may still be the right thing to buy; the justification has changed.

The honest way to build the plan now is: adults by hours, children by competence and contact, both reviewed at appraisal. And record which framework and edition you used, because this is the second time in six years the children's document has changed shape.

Neither document is law

Worth being clear, because these frameworks are often presented as statutory. Both are professional consensus guidance. The statutory duties sit elsewhere: for adults, in the Care Act 2014 and its statutory guidance; for children, in the Children Acts and Working Together. Our guide to safeguarding children for health and care staff covers that framework, and our guide to Making Safeguarding Personal covers the principle that should shape how adult enquiries are actually conducted.

The practical consequence of "not statutory" is not that you can ignore it. It is that the level framework is evidence of what good looks like, and an inspector will ask how you decided which staff sit where — which is exactly the question the 2025 children's document now puts on you rather than answering for you.

What to do

Four things. Re-badge your children's safeguarding levels against the 2025 competencies and delete the hours. Keep the adult hours and check you are meeting the 50 per cent participatory condition at Levels 3 and above. Reallocate levels by actual contact rather than job title, and write down the reasoning. And check your Level 1 list actually includes catering, domestic, maintenance and your board — because on the adult framework it should.

On frequency more generally, the three-year adult cycle and the appraisal-linked children's cycle are both framework conventions rather than legal intervals, which is the pattern across almost all mandatory training. We set out where the legal duty actually sits in our guide to how often mandatory training is really required.

This page was last updated:

Learnsignal Education Team

Expert Tutor at Learnsignal

Qualified professional with years of experience helping students advance their professional careers.

View all posts by Learnsignal Education Team

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Join over 30,000+ Learnsignal students and get regular insights delivered to your inbox.

Related Articles

SMC CME: All 50 Points Can Be Obtained Online, Except Five
Healthcare Compliance & CPD

SMC CME: All 50 Points Can Be Obtained Online, Except Five

The Singapore Medical Council states that all 50 CME points can be obtained entirely online — Category 3B is capped at 36 and Category 3A at 10. But the five medical ethics core points required from 2026 come from only three approved bodies, and no online provider can supply them.

Learnsignal Education Team8 min read
Aged Care Training: The Five Core Matters Action 2.9.6 Names
Healthcare Compliance & CPD

Aged Care Training: The Five Core Matters Action 2.9.6 Names

Action 2.9.6 of the Strengthened Quality Standards requires that all aged care workers regularly receive competency-based training in five named core matters. Plus the training system Actions 2.9.4, 2.9.5 and 2.9.7 require around it, and why competency is a different evidence trail from attendance.

Learnsignal Education Team8 min read
How a UK Care Home Budget Is Actually Built
Healthcare Compliance & CPD

How a UK Care Home Budget Is Actually Built

Staff costs at 55.3% of income, occupancy 88.7%, average fee £1,298 a week and EBITDARM at 30.1% — the published shape of a care home P&L, with the official Fair Cost of Care method, a fully itemised public hourly-rate build, and why every care budget breaks in April.

Learnsignal Education Team9 min read
Rostering Economics: No Regulator Sets a Staffing Number
Healthcare Compliance & CPD

Rostering Economics: No Regulator Sets a Staffing Number

CQC Regulation 18, the Scottish Act and Irish S.I. 415/2013 all decline to set staffing ratios — the Care Inspectorate says so explicitly. That makes safe staffing a costed judgement rather than a lookup. The method Scotland publishes, the variance report Ireland already requires, and the occupancy sensitivity that matters most.

Learnsignal Education Team9 min read

Ready to Start Your Learning Journey?

Join thousands of successful students who have achieved their qualifications with Learnsignal.

Ready to get started?

Join 100,000+ students across 130 countries. Choose a plan that fits your goals — cancel anytime.

View plans